Solar Principles and Laramie's Hitchcock House

As I explain in The Solar House, the basic principles of solar architecture were broadcast and applied nationwide starting in the mid-1940s, after having been established in the late 30s and early 40s by architects, especially George Fred Keck.

Here’s one striking example of those principles loosely applied: The “Hitchcock House” in Laramie, Wyoming, so-called for the architects Hitchcock & Hitchcock, and built in 1954. Laramie is my hometown currently so I’m quite familiar with the structure and I just happened to catch it at a photogenic moment.

Of special note are the windows in the center-left on the ground level. Here you find the classic arrangement of large panes of fixed insulated glass with a shading device above and ventilated louvers below. This formula was pioneered by Fred Keck and Paul Schweikher in c. 1940 and explained in detail in the book. In the picture above, at about 4:00PM in mid-August, you can see the shading working perfectly to prevent overheating. The roof overhang is doing well for the upstairs windows too. Clearly the architects understood solar geometry. (I wouldn't be surprised if they used Libbey-Owens-Ford's Sun Angle Calculator.)

This is a perfect illustration of the ubiquity of the 1940s solar house. Houses like this—typical but unique—can be found in cities and towns all over America after 1945. The late date here of 1954 shows how trends may be adopted late, or persist longer, in the hinterlands.

Now you probably expect the left side of the image faces south. Where Hitchcock & Hitchcock can be criticized (and why I said “loosely applied” above) is that we’re looking at the southwest corner of the structure, and so the beautifully-composed solar wall is facing west—not ideal orientation. If they had been following the Keck playbook faithfully, the house would have been long and narrow, running east-west, with the large amounts of glass and shading on the long south face. Indeed, it would be better if there were almost no glass on the west. Here the architects compromised and applied a typical south-facing technique to the west. There’s also too much glass on the north.

This is a classic theme in architectural history: techniques are misapplied as a movement or style is popularized and diffuses. As Goethe said, what is useful in one period becomes representational in the next.

Interior showing the ventilated louvers opened for cooling

Interior showing the ventilated louvers opened for cooling

Today the Hitchcock House is owned by the University of Wyoming. It’s been remodeled, with a significant addition, certified LEED Gold, and renamed the Bim Kendall House. More info here.  Thankfully during the renovation all of the original “solar” features were preserved, especially the ventilating louvers, which still perform their original function perfectly, providing excellent natural ventilation with building security, while those windows don’t need insect screens which would interfere with the view.

On ventilating louvers, see also: Keck's Sloan house II: a new look

A note on the solar architecture of the 1970s

My book The Solar House begins:

"The label ‘solar house’ typically conjures an image, I think, from the 1970s: an eccentrically-shaped structure with an oversized sloped glass wall and diagonal cedar siding.  Perhaps an earth berm.  A Volkswagen van nearby..."

The book then focuses on the period before 1973.  It includes a only broad overview of the solar architecture of the 1970s, with discussion of a few key examples.  I was not able to include every worthy house from that period, simply because so many appeared.

Yet I do think the solar architecture of the 1970s is a compelling subject, of course, and I'm especially interested in the aesthetic questions.  Because solar house design was strongly affiliated with the counterculture, it can be easy to dismiss with a laugh.

A stereotypical example (?)

A stereotypical example (?)

Or maybe it's beginning to look serious and attractive again now, as our tastes age.  And young people don't seem to find images like this to be ugly.  In any case, there are genuine, difficult issues to unpack when looking at the eccentric solar architecture of the 1970s and my book offers only a few small steps in that direction.  (Not only was there a lot of solar architecture after, say, 1973, there was a lot of discourse about aesthetics.)  I hope somebody else will continue to help us document and understand what happened and when that exists there should be a lot of new interpretations of 70s solar architecture.

I recently came upon a quotation from Susan C. Piedmont-Palladino which caused me to reflect again on some of these larger questions:

"...the trend towards integrated and more sophisticated technology may also allow environmentally responsible architecture of the future to avoid becoming ghettoized like the 'solar architecture' of the past.  The icons of the energy-conscious architecture of the 70sthe single-slope roof with attached solar collectors, the Trombe wall, etc.became stigmas in the 80s as the reality of scarcity was obscured by the illusion of plenty."*

I generally agree with the premise, that the stereotypical 70s solar house created a 'stigma' which damaged the social movement.  Is the solar house, as a type, still stigmatized?  Probably.  I've spoken of an "Age of Aquarius hangover" on occasion.

Still, it would be a shame, I think, if anyone interpreted the historical lesson to mean that progressive social movements should avoid experimental architecture.   Of all the possible motives for architecture to explore new forms, surely free renewable energy is compelling enough...

What do you think?

*"Building Alternatives," Perspecta 29 (1998).

An Active Solar Primer

Just in time for next week's American Solar Energy Society (ASES) conference...

My colleague Jon Gardzelewski & I were asked to write an article on active solar energy systems for a magazine for rural homeowners.  Here's a link:

Is Solar Electric or Solar Thermal Best for You? (pdf)

An essential point is that consumers who may have priced solar electric systems a few years ago should not assume that those prices would hold true today.  Here's a slide which I've used from time to time.

The Solar House: Then and Now, on Youtube

A talk I gave in March---at the National Museum of Wildlife Art in Jackson, WY---was professionally recorded and posted to Youtube.  It gives an overview of some of the themes of the book.  The title was "The Solar House: Then and Now."

This was part of the University of Wyoming's "Saturday University," an excellent program.  Thanks to Paul Flesher and the other organizers and sponsors.