James H. Garrott, AIA

I was asked by the Santa Monica Conservancy to give a short talk about James Homer Garrott (“Jimmy”), an African-American architect who practiced in Los Angeles from the 1920s to the 70s.

The recording is here: https://youtu.be/-8ZN6imKMTY?si=leW62vW15oVTdgHX
Zip ahead to about 32:30 for my part. It's only about 12 mins.

Some points from the talk:
• Garrott was essentially self-taught as an architect and became licensed by examination—amazing!
• His career is woefully under-documented. It isn’t known what happened to his materials when he closed his office. His Wikipedia page (created and maintained by me) is the best source for basic information.
• I interpret Garrott as a highly-competent mainstream professional architect, but not a “radical.”
• A few new archival photos are shown, including Garrott with Kenny Hahn, the Carson Public Library, and the original Mount Zion Baptist Church (later altered).

What is Mid-Century Modernism?

A new article by George Dodds argues that there is a “midcentury crisis,” because the category of Mid-Century Modern (MCM) architecture is too loosely defined.

I disagree, fully, so I figured I should write about it. In my opinion, Mid-Century Modernism is one of the easiest styles of architecture to define and identify. Here are the significant characteristics of Mid-Century Modernism, as I explain to my students. Since this is a kind of lecture, I created a slide deck:

To wrap: in Dodds’ article linked at the top, he spends a lot of time shaking his fist at the Wikipedia definition of Mid-century modern (plus, even more curiously, the Urban Dictionary). He looks to these sources because he says architectural history is “absent a dispassionate substantive third party.” This is wrong. Since 2004 the Getty Research Center has maintained the Art & Architecture Thesaurus. Here is how the Getty AAT defines Mid-Century Modernist (click image to link):

Now, the Getty AAT’s definition isn’t perfect, but it’s disconcerting to see a claim that architectural historians are simply flying blind. (We also have scholarly literature, like Alice Friedman’s, and textbooks, too!)

House of Tomorrow Earth Day event

I’m helping spread the word about an event on Earth Day which includes a tour of Fred Keck’s 1933 “House of Tomorrow,” of seminal importance to solar house history.

The event—Toward Sustainability—will occur on Saturday, April 22, 2023, and is free and open to the public. There are two parts:
1) A tour of the “House of Tomorrow” in Beverly Shores, Indiana (2:30pm local time)
2) A panel discussion at the Lubeznik Center for the Arts in Michigan City, Indiana (4:00-6:00pm local time)

Part 2 will be broadcast online; it will include these speakers:
Nancy Moldenhauer, Michigan City Sustainability Commission & President, Save the Dunes
Todd Zeiger, Director, Northern Regional Office at Indiana Landmarks
Nathan Kipnis, Principal, Kipnis Architecture + Planning
Alicia Ponce, Founder & Principal, AP Monarch
Dan Robinson, Indiana Program Associate, Solar United Neighbors

For more information, and to register for either or both, go here

Solar Decathlon: From critic to participant

Update: The University of Wyoming team placed fourth! [DOE link] [UWyo link]
(Not the Cinderella story we dreamed, but still a pretty great accomplishment.)

● ● ●

I’m proud to be a faculty advisor to the Wind River house, the University of Wyoming student project for the 2023 Solar Decathlon, which concludes next week. This might be surprising, since I’ve been somewhat critical of the event over the years.

In The Solar House, which is primarily a historical study of the years 1933‒1973, I ended the book with a short discussion of the Decathlon to indicate the possible futures of the solar house. At that time, the Department of Energy-sponsored competition occurred on the National Mall in Washington, and therefore the houses needed to be small and transportable. I wrote:

The Solar Decathlon has endured criticism on a number of points. The need to build the houses at various home locations and then transport them to the competition site requires an inordinate amount of time, energy and cost for the teams. It also gives the competition itself a large carbon footprint. Narrow boxy shapes have predominated due to the rigors of transportation, but more problematically this requirement compels lightweight construction materials and effectively deters students from exploring thermal mass strategies.

And later:

Future historians will determine whether the Decathlon houses will be interpreted as peculiar vanity projects or whether a more profound meaning will emerge.

Then, here on this blog, I’ve posted a number of items, usually critical of the contest—though never of the student-participants:

The Next Solar Decathlon (Aug 2018) — signaling the shift to permanent houses
Too Expensive: The Solar Decathlon (redux) (Nov 2017)
Solar Decathlon 2017 (Oct 2017)
2017 Solar Decathlon: Denver (Mar 2016)
#SD2015 (Oct 2015) — I questioned using students as laborers
Help Wanted: The Solar Decathlon (Sep 2015) — my most pointed criticism and some suggestions which were adopted
Too Expensive: The Solar Decathlon (Sep 2015)
The “Shading Decathlon”? (Apr 2014)
The Solar Decathlon: Back to Irvine (Apr 2014)

So why did I agree to participate in the 2023 contest? Because they made two major changes:
1) Now, the houses are site-specific, site-built, and permanent. They are real and enduring, not transportable and temporary exhibitions. The artificial design problem of transportability (which dominated the contest) has been eliminated.
2) The student-teams are allowed to partner with builders and financial partners, shifting the effort to design, engineering, and project management, away from direct construction and fundraising.

With those factors in mind, here is some additional information about the Wind River house:

The Sun Queen

Update: You can watch “The Sun Queen”: here

● ● ●

I’m looking forward to “The Sun Queen,” a new documentary which explores the life of Mária Telkes. It will be shown on PBS, April 4. (I was asked to participate in this program, but it did not work out.)

Telkes is a significant figure in my book The Solar House. In it, I discuss in detail the 1948 Dover Sun House, engineered by Telkes with a novel method of attic-level heat storage using barrels of salt, and fan-powered distribution of hot air. It was surely “the most widely-published solar house ever” at the time, I wrote. The book also discusses her fractious relationship with Hoyt Hottel and the solar engineers at MIT.

Dover Sun House, from The Solar House.

Here is a link to the PBS press release. It says, in part:

Completed in 1948, the Dover Sun House was, unlike earlier prototypes, designed to be lived in by a family; that Christmas, the Nemethys, a Hungarian émigré family, moved in. It was soon one of the most famous houses in the country, and Telkes became a media celebrity. The “Sun Queen,” as she was known in the press, fast became the nation’s most visible face of the solar future. That fame, which Telkes leveraged to further the solar cause, came at a cost. The boys’ club at MIT was unimpressed by her latest project and, in 1953, she was fired.

● ● ●

See also:
In the News: The Dover Sun House
Unearthed: Dover Sun House comic